<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The new Radiohead, as we listen to it.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.donewaiting.com/2007/10/10/the-new-radiohead-as-we-listen-to-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.donewaiting.com/2007/10/10/the-new-radiohead-as-we-listen-to-it/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:07:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: c dub</title>
		<link>http://www.donewaiting.com/2007/10/10/the-new-radiohead-as-we-listen-to-it/#comment-9019</link>
		<dc:creator>c dub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 02:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donewaiting.com/2007/10/10/the-new-radiohead-as-we-listen-to-it/#comment-9019</guid>
		<description>Blinking in my inbox like a traffic light in a vacant downtown intersection, there it is, the e-mail from Waste (Radiohead). The e-mail came in around 1:30 am, plenty of time to sit down with it a few times in the wee hours of the morning. With this release, there was a first for both me as a music buyer, and Radiohead as a band. In Rainbows, the band’s seventh studio record, is being released sans record label, and more importantly, sans physical compact disc or LP. The mp3 download of the record was offered about a week ago for a “name your price” offer. People going to their website could basically let their conscious guide them to either giving Radiohead $20 or .20 cents for the new album. The adventurous soul could also shell out over $80 to get actually discs and vinyl that would arrive in a box set sometime in December. But enough about all that.
Is it any good? In a word, yes. The style has not changed much from their last three - Kid A, Amnesiac and Hail to the Thief. I expected the usually knob twiddling and squelched sound effects, and they appear from the start. In Rainbows has its share of sparse beats, incomprehensible vocals and lush orchestration, but not much in the way of straight forward guitars, emotional punch or, well, classic styled tunes.
Like their last three albums (and Thom Yorke’s solo work), I really enjoy what they put out, but ultimately feel they give the listener a cold experience, more times than they should. On occasion, they manage to break through the blips and whirls with some stunning emotion and almost jazz-like instrumentation.
The problem in recent years is these flashes of brilliance and warmth come too far and few between all of the tinkering. I always go back to OK Computer and compare how I felt when I first heard that. It was just as challenging (at the time), but was more rewarding than anything anyone could have imagined. It became a classic. Kid A was also a challenging and stunning new idea of what the band could do. That too became a landmark record for them and rightfully so, it changed how the music world viewed them and what they were capable of. I’ve always thought the follow-up releases (Amnesiac and Hail to the Thief) were nothing more than extensions of Kid A. Both contained their moments but failed at becoming the next watershed record we all thought would eventually happen.
Maybe that’s the problem? After 6 stellar records, 2 or 3 of them being downright essential owns, is releasing a really good record just not enough?
In Rainbows does its job though, and does it extremely well, there are some excellent tunes on here for sure. Nude is an amazing highlight, a song they have been working on for quite some time, and from the sound of it, they’ve nailed it. Beautiful string arrangements and a minimalist approach to the vocals are both creepy and endearing at the same time. The opening track, 15 Step, builds to an amazing climax of beats and strings and drowns out all the song’s frosty start with clank after clank of drumbeats and samples. It could be said the style of such a song is very Radiohead, though it lacks the emotional punch of earlier Radiohead songs like: How To Disappear Completely, Let Down, or Street Spirit. This is not true. There’s a lot of emotion that Thom pours into every muffled lyric. The album’s seventh track, Reckoner, oddly hangs its hat on a nice and simple, plucking guitar lead. Very Beatles inspired of all things. The guitar sound on Reckoner defiantly rubs shoulders with another almost mumbling vocal line from Thom. It proves to be another interesting mix of electronic and traditional instrumentation. The album’s closer, Videotape, is probably In Rainbow’s most cohesive, epic, yet minimalist moment. The drum and piano loops are mesmerizing, the sparse piano seems to paint this apocalyptic picture (at least in my head), and the results are amazing. This is only trumped by my favorite track, the hauntingly beautiful, All I Need. Slow in tempo and heavy on bass lines, Thom’s voice seems to sound the best when dripped at this slower pace. Great lyrics, nice and moody, it’s some wonderful stuff captured on wax, I mean MP3 file.
So, have Thom and co. set their bar to high? I’m not sure, but as In Rainbows’ Nude says, “there’s seems to be something missing.” I just think the missing parts aren’t that important anymore, especially to the band. In the end, that’s the catch, because In Rainbows is a great record in the scheme of things. It’s a shame its business model is over-shadowing the songs in these early stages, time will tell whether that holds up. I’d like to think good songs always win out, in which case, I like Radiohead’s odds. Now, if only had some cover art to look at.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blinking in my inbox like a traffic light in a vacant downtown intersection, there it is, the e-mail from Waste (Radiohead). The e-mail came in around 1:30 am, plenty of time to sit down with it a few times in the wee hours of the morning. With this release, there was a first for both me as a music buyer, and Radiohead as a band. In Rainbows, the band’s seventh studio record, is being released sans record label, and more importantly, sans physical compact disc or LP. The mp3 download of the record was offered about a week ago for a “name your price” offer. People going to their website could basically let their conscious guide them to either giving Radiohead $20 or .20 cents for the new album. The adventurous soul could also shell out over $80 to get actually discs and vinyl that would arrive in a box set sometime in December. But enough about all that.<br />
Is it any good? In a word, yes. The style has not changed much from their last three &#8211; Kid A, Amnesiac and Hail to the Thief. I expected the usually knob twiddling and squelched sound effects, and they appear from the start. In Rainbows has its share of sparse beats, incomprehensible vocals and lush orchestration, but not much in the way of straight forward guitars, emotional punch or, well, classic styled tunes.<br />
Like their last three albums (and Thom Yorke’s solo work), I really enjoy what they put out, but ultimately feel they give the listener a cold experience, more times than they should. On occasion, they manage to break through the blips and whirls with some stunning emotion and almost jazz-like instrumentation.<br />
The problem in recent years is these flashes of brilliance and warmth come too far and few between all of the tinkering. I always go back to OK Computer and compare how I felt when I first heard that. It was just as challenging (at the time), but was more rewarding than anything anyone could have imagined. It became a classic. Kid A was also a challenging and stunning new idea of what the band could do. That too became a landmark record for them and rightfully so, it changed how the music world viewed them and what they were capable of. I’ve always thought the follow-up releases (Amnesiac and Hail to the Thief) were nothing more than extensions of Kid A. Both contained their moments but failed at becoming the next watershed record we all thought would eventually happen.<br />
Maybe that’s the problem? After 6 stellar records, 2 or 3 of them being downright essential owns, is releasing a really good record just not enough?<br />
In Rainbows does its job though, and does it extremely well, there are some excellent tunes on here for sure. Nude is an amazing highlight, a song they have been working on for quite some time, and from the sound of it, they’ve nailed it. Beautiful string arrangements and a minimalist approach to the vocals are both creepy and endearing at the same time. The opening track, 15 Step, builds to an amazing climax of beats and strings and drowns out all the song’s frosty start with clank after clank of drumbeats and samples. It could be said the style of such a song is very Radiohead, though it lacks the emotional punch of earlier Radiohead songs like: How To Disappear Completely, Let Down, or Street Spirit. This is not true. There’s a lot of emotion that Thom pours into every muffled lyric. The album’s seventh track, Reckoner, oddly hangs its hat on a nice and simple, plucking guitar lead. Very Beatles inspired of all things. The guitar sound on Reckoner defiantly rubs shoulders with another almost mumbling vocal line from Thom. It proves to be another interesting mix of electronic and traditional instrumentation. The album’s closer, Videotape, is probably In Rainbow’s most cohesive, epic, yet minimalist moment. The drum and piano loops are mesmerizing, the sparse piano seems to paint this apocalyptic picture (at least in my head), and the results are amazing. This is only trumped by my favorite track, the hauntingly beautiful, All I Need. Slow in tempo and heavy on bass lines, Thom’s voice seems to sound the best when dripped at this slower pace. Great lyrics, nice and moody, it’s some wonderful stuff captured on wax, I mean MP3 file.<br />
So, have Thom and co. set their bar to high? I’m not sure, but as In Rainbows’ Nude says, “there’s seems to be something missing.” I just think the missing parts aren’t that important anymore, especially to the band. In the end, that’s the catch, because In Rainbows is a great record in the scheme of things. It’s a shame its business model is over-shadowing the songs in these early stages, time will tell whether that holds up. I’d like to think good songs always win out, in which case, I like Radiohead’s odds. Now, if only had some cover art to look at.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: c dub</title>
		<link>http://www.donewaiting.com/2007/10/10/the-new-radiohead-as-we-listen-to-it/#comment-9004</link>
		<dc:creator>c dub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 21:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donewaiting.com/2007/10/10/the-new-radiohead-as-we-listen-to-it/#comment-9004</guid>
		<description>I wrote a quickie review here:

http://www.drinkmoloko.com/v2/

please be gentle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote a quickie review here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.drinkmoloko.com/v2/" rel="nofollow">http://www.drinkmoloko.com/v2/</a></p>
<p>please be gentle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tankboy</title>
		<link>http://www.donewaiting.com/2007/10/10/the-new-radiohead-as-we-listen-to-it/#comment-9000</link>
		<dc:creator>tankboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 13:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donewaiting.com/2007/10/10/the-new-radiohead-as-we-listen-to-it/#comment-9000</guid>
		<description>Listen to the intro, that&#039;s where the comparison comes in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Listen to the intro, that&#8217;s where the comparison comes in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lisa</title>
		<link>http://www.donewaiting.com/2007/10/10/the-new-radiohead-as-we-listen-to-it/#comment-8999</link>
		<dc:creator>lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 13:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donewaiting.com/2007/10/10/the-new-radiohead-as-we-listen-to-it/#comment-8999</guid>
		<description>thanks for doing this! can&#039;t wait!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for doing this! can&#8217;t wait!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.donewaiting.com/2007/10/10/the-new-radiohead-as-we-listen-to-it/#comment-8998</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 12:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donewaiting.com/2007/10/10/the-new-radiohead-as-we-listen-to-it/#comment-8998</guid>
		<description>What a load of rubbish. What song does Reckoner sound like then? House of Cards is nothing like Pyramid Song.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a load of rubbish. What song does Reckoner sound like then? House of Cards is nothing like Pyramid Song.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loudersoft - A Lost Tricycle In A Ten-Speed World. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 10 10 10 10 10</title>
		<link>http://www.donewaiting.com/2007/10/10/the-new-radiohead-as-we-listen-to-it/#comment-8996</link>
		<dc:creator>Loudersoft - A Lost Tricycle In A Ten-Speed World. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 10 10 10 10 10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 08:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donewaiting.com/2007/10/10/the-new-radiohead-as-we-listen-to-it/#comment-8996</guid>
		<description>[...] But Green Lights Gorilla vs. Bear Done Waiting     &#160; &#124; Permanent Link to This Post [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But Green Lights Gorilla vs. Bear Done Waiting     &nbsp; | Permanent Link to This Post [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
